How these are worked out — the equations behind this sheet, their sources, and what each one assumes.
Where people go wrong
The errors this method actually invites, and what it does about each. Every one of them is already a warning somewhere — in a note that appears when your own figures trip it, in the scope statement, or in the equations behind the page. Collected here so you can read them before you need them.
Using a section's two-dimensional lift figure straight. A finite wing never reaches the maximum its section manages in a wind tunnel: the tips leak and the flow runs spanwise, and about a tenth of it goes. The picker's figures are two-dimensional and the sheet applies the 0.90 for you. Type a number in from a polar without taking that tenth off and the stall speed reads about five per cent low, which is the wrong direction to be wrong in.
Leaving the temperature blank on a hot day. Blank means the standard atmosphere, which is 15 °C at sea level. At 45 °C and dry the air has lost 9.4% of its density: the stall speed goes up 5.1% and the Reynolds number down 16.1%. The sheet will not guess the weather for you.
Comparing wing loading between models of different size. Grams per square decimetre is not scale-independent — double every dimension at the same wing loading and you have a different aeroplane. Wing cube loading is the figure that compares, and it is beside it for that reason.
Reading the Reynolds number as the one the wing always sees. It is worked out at 1.6 times the stall speed, which is a cruise. On finals at 1.3 times the stall it is a fifth lower, so a section sitting near the bottom of its useful band in the cruise is below it when it matters most.
Taking the mean chord for the mean aerodynamic chord. On a tapered wing they are not the same number, and MAC is the one the balance sheet's tail volume and centre of gravity both hang off. The sheet computes it properly and publishes it to Sheet 03.